Converting Quarterly title
The Official
Technical Magazine
of AIMCAL
small AIMCAL logo
  Search

Web Handling & Converting

Blogmaster: Dr. David Roisum

17

Continuing the theme of the previous post, we now turn to an even stickier bit of wishful thinking.  That is, the desire/hope/wish/belief/etc that winding defects can be cured (to everyone’s satisfaction) or at least noticeably remedied by changing the winder TNT (Tension, Nip, Torque) curves.  Here we have the blessing (not!) of not just one knob but perhaps as many as three knobs.  Here we have the blessing (not!) of not just a setpoint, but possibly taper and even curves to play with.  Here we have the blessing (not!) of the teachings and writings of machine builders and experts alike; pay attention to winder programming.  All we have to do is to get back to where we were on Tuesday when they weren’t running any defects.  (In my problem solving course, I call this the fallacy of the Sweet Spot).

Unfortunately, with winders we literally have an infinite number of combinations of three knobs positions taken three at a time and then a further iteration on curve shapes.  Unfortunately, we may get stuck beyond the length of our career, trials might go on to the heat death of the universe; especially if we add new products and conditions and constraints.  Unfortunately, the machine builders have given us knobs and the admonition to use them; but no specifics for any defect.  Unfortunately, most winding defects are not largely affected by tension, nip and/or torque curves.  Certain types of roll edge offsets, have no tightness sensitivity.  Certain types of starring, have no practical tension sensitivity.  Most gage related defects such as bagginess (caused by gage bands), corrugations, ridges and others may have have little practical tightness sensitivity.  Even loose defects, such as a loose core caused by winding on a wet core, may have little practical tightness sensitivity.  Even tight defects, such as caused by film shrinkage, may have little practical practical winding tightness sensitivity.

So, again we recognize getting stuck in the same way;  we’ve been playing with the knobs for a while now and life is still not CONSISTENTLY good.  So, again we get unstuck in the same way; go to school on Critical Thinking in Converting to think outside the (control) box.  So again we get unstuck by going to school on Winding Machines, Mechanics and Measurements.

Comments

There are currently no comments, be the first to post one.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above:

Blogmaster

David Roisum photo

Dr. David Roisum

Dr. Roisum is a well-known authority in the area of web handling and converting. He has authored seven books, including Winding, Rollers and Web-Handling and has coauthored or edited several others. He was a technical editor for Converting Magazine with a monthly column entitled "Web Works." An accomplished professional speaker and instructor, Roisum has been praised for his skill at translating highly technical information into a common sense practical reference. Dave has been honored by TAPPI with their Finishing & Converting Division Award, Thomas W. Busch Prize and Finest Faculty awards and is a TAPPI Fellow. Dave received his Ph.D. from the Web Handling Research Center where he later became an Industrial Advisory Board member.

Dave has worked for the Beloit Corporation as a designer of winding machinery and later as a manager of research, and for Kimberly-Clark as a converting expert serving all business units. He is now a principal of Finishing Technologies Inc., providing consulting services to more than 300 clients who convert or manufacture: paper, film, foil, nonwovens, textiles and many other materials. He has accumulated much practical experience working in nearly 1,000 plants over the course of more than three decades.