Converting Quarterly title
The Official
Technical Magazine
of AIMCAL
small AIMCAL logo
  Search

Vacuum Web Coating

Blogmaster: Dr. Charles A. Bishop

07

Question: I have a query on the metallised films. Does the pinhole count vary with the thickness of the film, for eg. what would be the rough estimation (in case if the studies are available) of pinhole count in a 15 micron, 20 micron and 30 micron vacuum metallised BOPP film? Is it true the higher the thickness, the lesser the pinhole count or is it vice-versa?

Answer: The pinholes are primarily as a result of contamination of the film during manufacture.  The amount of dust that falls on the film is related to the exposure time between the extruder and the winding up of the roll and the amount of static charge that is generated by the film.  Thus it is possible for there to be different levels depending on film thickness as the exposure times will differ and the amount of static charge will also differ. The amount of static charge may also be affected by antistatic treatments too.

What I do not think can be predicted is the level of pinholes for any given thickness of film.

However as thicker films are generally produced at a slower winding speed than thinner films there will be more time for dust to settle on thicker films than thinner films produced on the same film line in the same factory location. Unless the film is made by the same manufacturer and on the same film line then there is always likely to be differences because of different location and local atmospheric conditions.  These differences can be expected to be even greater between different manufacturers, even of nominally the same film.

Another thing that can affect the pinhole count is the tension and rewinding of the film in the vacuum system and downstream of the metallization process. Once the film has the metal coating applied it is the movement of the debris that exposes the pinholes and so any slip between layers of film within the roll can help the debris move and so show up as pinholes.  Thinner films have to be wound using lower tensions and are generally more difficult to wind than thicker films and so may expect more pinholes to be exposed. However this does not mean the cleanliness of the film is necessarily any different but only that a smaller number of the debris particles present have been displaced following metallization.

The thickness of metallization can have an effect although it might not be a large effect.  Thicker metal coatings can have fewer pinholes and other defects simply because any pinholes formed during metallization may get some metal coating even if not the full amount and as the metal coating is thicker it is a little tougher and so displacing the debris may require a little more force than for the thinner coatings. Also some pinholes are not really pinholes but are areas where the coating is incomplete and with the thicker coating there are fewer of these voids.

Although thicker coatings may have fewer pinholes the thickness variation is likely to be larger as even at the last of the deposition occurs there will still be some holes that are not filled and so the variation is between no coating and full thickness. Even where there has been nucleation the orientation of the crystal structure can vary with some growing faster than others and so as time increases so too does the difference in the slower growing crystals and faster growing crystals.  

So the film substrate can have  an effect on pinholes either from the slower rate of manufacture of thicker film or between different manufacturers.  Also the metal coating can can change the number of pinholes as well as the roughness can increase with coating thickness.

Comments

#157 Esther
Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:26 AM
I am not sure that - Thicker metal coatings can have fewer pinholes ...
thicker metallize layer means darker appearance .. then easier to find the pinholes
#159 Charles Bishop
Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:59 AM
Yes the pinholes might be easier to see in the thicker metallized films because of the better contrast between the darkness of the coating and brightness of thepinhole. However, this does not mean to say that the pinholes are not present in the thinner metal films. SImply because it is harder to discern the pinholes does not mean they are not present and having a detrimental effect to the barrier performance of the coating.
Wednesday, June 22, 2011 8:46 AM
Is it not logical to think that on the other hand, the thicker the metalized layer, the higher the chances that some potential pinhole (rough surface of the carrier) might be metalized and thus the total amount of pinholes reduced?
#164 Charles Bishop
Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:28 AM
Pinholes are generally independent of thickness. The large majority of pinholes are caused by surface debris that is moved after being coated and so the pinhole appears after the coating process is completed. As even for thick coatings the coating thickness is very small, usually tens of nm, by comparison to the size of the debris that is coated and moved, usually microns to tens of microns, the mechanics of moving the debris do not substantially change irrespective of thickness.

Pinholes produced by pick-off are determined by a difference in adhesion and so this too may be largely independent of coating thickness.

The holes that are defined as pores are produced as a result of the nucleation and growth process and can be affected by the deposition process and so are different to pinholes which are produced after the deposition process.

The pores or gaps between different nucleated islands will reduce in size with increasing coating thickness but it can take many tens of nm to eliminate them altogether. I have seen these pores still visible in coatings that have been greater than 1 micron in thickness. This was an extreme case but did highlight the process. As atoms deposit in to gaps they are drawn to the large crystals nearby and will be absorbed by them leaving behind the gap. THe crystal as it absorbs the atoms will increase in size but only slowly and so the speed the gap is reduced is slow and so the thickness of the coating can increse considerably before the pores are finally closed and at this point the thickness of the coating will vary from the bottom of the pore where the coating thickness will be 1 monolayer through to the thickness of the highest crystal. Which can make the coating quite rough and thus specular reflectance may be reduced.

Hence increasing the substrate surface energy to get better wetting of the coating can reduce the number of these pores and improve the surface roughness and so give a better specular reflectance.

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above:

Blogmaster

Charles Bishop photo

Dr. Charles A. Bishop

Charles is a toolmaker by trade after completing a mechanical engineering apprenticeship. He then entered University and obtained a Bachelors degree in materials engineering with a Diploma in Industrial Studies. During his final year he first started work on vacuum based research, helping develop a process for manufacturing titanium based bone implants for tendon location. He went on to obtain a Masters degree and Doctorate following further research into vacuum deposition processes. During this time and as a postgraduate he also worked as a consultant.

Charles next spent time in industry working for various divisions of ICI including polyesters, nylon, Imagedata, Flex Products Inc., and explosives as well as contributing to other projects. In 1998 he took the opportunity to return to consultancy work and set up his own company.

Charles has more than 30 years experience in vacuum deposition mainly onto flexible webs. He has regularly contributed papers to conferences and recently has edited this blog on behalf of AIMCAL as well as being one of their presenters for various webinars and the more formal Converting School courses.

Charles has also published 2 books, Vacuum deposition onto webs, films and foils and Roll-to-roll vacuum deposition of barrier coatings.